The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast – 349. Tyranny Through Weaponized Bureaucracy | Dr. Scott Jensen

Intro

In this episode of “The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast,” Dr. Jordan Peterson interviews Dr. Scott Jensen, a family medicine practitioner and former Minnesota Senator. They discuss the weaponization of bureaucracy and its implications, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Dr. Jensen shares his personal experiences and challenges as he spoke out against the prevailing narrative and faced backlash from his professional governing body. This episode sheds light on the dangers of tyranny through weaponized bureaucracy and the importance of standing up for truth and liberty.

Main Takeaways

Weaponization of Bureaucracy

• Dr. Scott Jensen believes that the weaponization of bureaucracy is a form of tyranny that people need to be aware of.
• The lack of context and access to information makes it difficult to understand the true nature of the situations we are dealing with.
• The CDC advised physicians to put COVID-19 as the cause of death, even if it was just a contributing condition, which raises questions about the reliability of cause-of-death data.
• High-placed officials like Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx had absolute power during the pandemic, which impacted the reliability of information and decision-making.
• Corrupted data can lead to false impressions and opportunities for corruption.

Challenges Faced by Dr. Scott Jensen

• Dr. Jensen faced backlash from his professional governing body for his views on COVID-19 and was threatened with losing his medical license.
• The investigations by the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice had a devastating effect on Dr. Jensen’s personal and professional life.
• Dr. Jensen highlights the importance of getting a good lawyer to navigate the investigations and protect professional integrity.
• The line between professional conduct and free speech in relation to patient care is unclear, which puts professionals at risk.
• Dr. Jensen’s experience demonstrates the potential weaponization of regulatory agencies for political purposes.

The Importance of Speaking Out

• Dr. Jensen felt morally responsible for speaking out against the prevailing narrative on COVID-19, despite the challenges he faced.
• Speaking out can cause tensions within families and push individuals to their psychological and physical limits.
• Support from colleagues came in the form of letters seeking absolution, highlighting the fear and reluctance to openly support controversial views.
• Professionals may have to live in fear of their freedom of speech, which could negatively impact their ability to provide quality care to their patients.
• The need for clear boundaries between First Amendment speech and professional conduct in medicine is crucial.

The Dangers of Reputation Attacks

• Accusations and attacks on reputation can have a devastating effect on individuals’ personal and professional lives.
• Regulatory agencies can be weaponized, and anyone subject to them is at risk.
• The process of inquisitions should be made public record to ensure transparency and accountability.
• Dr. Jensen emphasizes the importance of being prepared for future attacks on one’s reputation and the need for legal support.
• Presumption of innocence and the right to defend oneself are crucial in maintaining a just society.

Summary

Weaponization of Bureaucracy

Dr. Scott Jensen highlights the dangers of the weaponization of bureaucracy, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The lack of context and access to information makes it challenging to understand the true nature of the situations we face. The CDC’s advice to physicians to put COVID-19 as the cause of death, even in cases where it was a contributing condition, raises concerns about the reliability of cause-of-death data. The concentration of power in high-placed officials like Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx also impacts the reliability of information and decision-making. Corrupted data can lead to false impressions and opportunities for corruption.

Challenges Faced by Dr. Scott Jensen

Dr. Jensen shares his personal experiences and challenges as he spoke out against the prevailing narrative on COVID-19. He faced backlash from his professional governing body and was threatened with losing his medical license. The investigations by the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice had a devastating effect on his personal and professional life, limiting his ability to advocate for his beliefs. Dr. Jensen emphasizes the importance of getting a good lawyer to navigate the investigations and protect professional integrity. The unclear line between professional conduct and free speech in relation to patient care puts professionals at risk.

The Importance of Speaking Out

Despite the challenges he faced, Dr. Jensen felt morally responsible for speaking out against the prevailing narrative on COVID-19. Speaking out can cause tensions within families and push individuals to their psychological and physical limits. Support from colleagues came in the form of letters seeking absolution, highlighting the fear and reluctance to openly support controversial views. Professionals may have to live in fear of their freedom of speech, which could negatively impact their ability to provide quality care to their patients. The need for clear boundaries between First Amendment speech and professional conduct in medicine is crucial.

The Dangers of Reputation Attacks

Dr. Jensen discusses the devastating effect of accusations and attacks on reputation. Regulatory agencies can be weaponized, putting anyone subject to them at risk. The process of inquisitions should be made public record to ensure transparency and accountability. Dr. Jensen emphasizes the importance of being prepared for future attacks on one’s reputation and the need for legal support. Presumption of innocence and the right to defend oneself are crucial in maintaining a just society.

Conclusion

Dr. Scott Jensen’s conversation with Dr. Jordan Peterson sheds light on the weaponization of bureaucracy and its implications, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The challenges faced by Dr. Jensen highlight the importance of speaking out against prevailing narratives, despite the potential consequences. The dangers of reputation attacks and the need for clear boundaries between professional conduct and free speech are crucial considerations. This episode serves as a reminder of the importance of truth, integrity, and the protection of individual liberties.